“Fear women” – Reactions as DNA proves husband not the biological father of 1 year old daughter

0
50
Advertisement

A DNA result has proven that a baby girl does not belong to the supposed man believed to be her biological father.

A viral post we have chanced on X shows a certificate copy of a legal paternity test conducted by ‘BlUEPRINT DNA ORGANISATION’.

Advertisement

The said letter bears the name of one ‘Richard Antwi’ the supposed father of a little girl, ‘Richlove Antwi’, who is just a year older.

As concluded in the paternal test letter, Richard Antwi has been excluded from being the biological father of Richlove Antwi, the supposed daughter after effective multiple DNA tests.

The reason being so is that, the man does not have the genetic markers which needs to be present for the little girl’s biological father.

The conclusion of the DNA test reads; “RICHARD ANTWI is excluded from being the biological father of RICHLOVE ANTWI. The exclusion is based on the fact that he does not show the genetic markers which have to be present for the biological father of the child RICHLOVE ANTWI at multiple DNA-Systems. Therefore, it is practically proven that RICHARD ANTWI is not the biological father of RICHLOVE ANTWI.”

"Fear women" - Reactions as DNA proves husband not the biological father of 1 year old daughter

Some X users dropped these interesting comments.

"Fear women" - Reactions as DNA proves husband not the biological father of 1 year old daughter
"Fear women" - Reactions as DNA proves husband not the biological father of 1 year old daughter
"Fear women" - Reactions as DNA proves husband not the biological father of 1 year old daughter
"Fear women" - Reactions as DNA proves husband not the biological father of 1 year old daughter

Advertisement